No. 19-8412
Lenroy McLean v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court criminal-procedure discretion discretionary-review forfeiture plain-error sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantial-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Second Circuit Court of Appeals exercise its discretion to correct the forfeited error of Petitioner's miscalculated guideline sentence that has affected his substantial rights with previous factual decision intact?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . QUESTION I ; Should the Second Circuit Court of Appeals exercise it's discretion to correct the forfeited error of Petitioner's miscalculated guideline sentence that has affected his substantial rights with previous factual decision intact? QUESTION ITI Does words mean things and/or they have specific definitions, : especially in arguable basis either in law or in facts of a forfeited , plain error sentencing? . -i
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Lenroy McLean
Lenroy McLean — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent