No. 19-842
Mark J. Schwartz v. Clark County, Nevada, et al.
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-discretion federal-jurisdiction judicial-bias qualified-immunity section-1983 seniority-manipulation state-law supplemental-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the district court abuse its discretion when it fails to differentiate between federal and state law claims under 28 U.S.C. §1367?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Does the district court abuse its discretion when it fails to differentiate between federal and state law when exercising its authority over state laws claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367? B. Can delayed generic jury instruction actually cure judicial bias? C. Does a supervisor violate §1983 when they abuse their authority to manipulate the seniority rankings to effectuate the layoff of a targeted individual based upon the supervisor’s personal prejudice? I
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2019-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark Schwartz
Mary F. Chapman — Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd., Petitioner
Mary F. Chapman — Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd., Petitioner