Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded several jurors for failing to follow the voir dire process

No question identified. : a Question’) Presented : LWShetaty it if Undonttitulien Sr Jerense Counsel to Qdnit an actutes OUiNt to The uel Ovte-The acCusl'S ObikChng! Find algo adMit eng ACCUSEY Wit Juring the Stating Hearing Over the accusers Oblectan o.. Whetretne tial Court abuser kS AUldvetion Wht 4 Arciudtd Seved Auror$ Foy Favti@Petiny iw-the Voir Jive Process OA-pre COuES OWh © Fehon) Find \ bas trial Counsel ineekve for Farin +s ohjecd? SB. Whether the trial Couve abuses ike dikCvetion When + veruse +e atid Prt derective Who ok the ACCUsssy Stedehent be yead an QCcusea’s Grote ent ty ne JUN Wit Hat Qecuses'¢ Wants +he Grarhtnt ead 40 the Ju? Bind Wherry re accuseds Graterent is main When-tre Pro Secutar does nod Went to WR Ane ACCUSY'S Cratehent UH Whether the Wittontis Qurene Court adda 0 —Hrird alent +9 Sick AOI NV. \Sathiontstonl bb ALC Ld QA gh EN AS JeciGiong in Graken, . StarkS, BoB WE 14, 59bo, pind Stake V. RomevoGrevvang , D014 WE GSH, U Hl, Blo WIS Dd 5H GUN. 24 LbO / S. Whetne the WiStonfin SuPrane Court decision ty State V. Escalona — Coste Jecifion in MactnezV. Ren, Sbb WS \QaidS) a oO