whether the trial court violated petitioners right to a speedy and public trial

No question identified. : . ISSUES FOR REVIEW PRESENTED : ISSUE NO. ONE ; whether the trial court violated petitioners right toa speedy and public trial, Where petitioner was held in Webb County Jail for almmost seven and a half year pending a’ trial by jury, with an outrageous 450.000 oo. dollar bound, where he spent seven and a half years before a actual jury was enpanaled for a jury trial. ISSUE NO. TWO; Whether the trial court errored and denied petitioners right to a fair sentencing trial of his affirmative defense taken and then rejected by the jury, and for sentencing petitioner in accordance with the jurys verdict however ussing this same jury to impose a 70 year prison sentence, however on the recomended sentence of the prosecutor, ten years for every bullet he fired 7 tell the jury he fired 7 bullets, the jury and the judge then impossed a strait 70 year sentence for murder. ISSUE NO. THREE Whether Petitioner recieved Ineffective assistance of trial counsel who aided the state in stalling the case, where then after a trial by jury seven and a half years later, trial counsel fails to file Motion for new trial of a murder conviction and 70 year prison sentence of February 24, 2018. And ineffective assitance of appeal counsel who was same counsel of jury trial, where in-his direct appeal brief counsel states that a timely notice of appeal ~ was filed on February 24, 2017, an entére year earlier then his trial date had be even started on February 26, 2018 ending in March 5, 2018. : ISSUE NO. FOUR: whether the court of appeals has errored in not reversing the 70 , year prison sentence, where petitioner was entitled to reversal after direct appeal was final, where the goverment mental records of petitioner mental status confirms petitioner was entitled to a special sentence such as a ten year sentence for the murder, not a ten year sentence for every bullet fired 7 bullet 70 years : strait sentence, a affirmative defense rejected by the jury at actual arraignment federal stage proceeding for murder for affirming a Domestict violance of an extraneous offense submitted to jury over objection. : ISSUE NO. FIVE Main issue for granting writ, whether the goverment trial court jury, court of appeals errored when conspirring with the federal stage proceedings & in the rejection of his Temporarily Insanity defense, for dispossing of a federal | stage , and impossing an illegal 70 year prison sentence for murder, Petitioner was diagnosed with PTSD by the goverment in 1992, And worked as a Border Patrole agent for 12 year permitted to carry a gun, and that due to his wrongfull termination cause undue stress and petitioner to shoot and kill his wife. However rejects his affirmative defense to except no liability of the federal yoverment, reevaluating petitioner by Rusk State Hospital in 2013 after the murder had accurred. ii. TABLE OF STATUTES STATE STATUTE Page V.A.C.C.P. Art. 28.01 9,10 V.A.C.C.P. Art. 26.02 9 VeA.C.C.P. Art. 36.01 1l Texas Rules of evidence 401, 402 15 Texas Rules of Evidence 404 (b) , 404 (b)(2) 15, 17 Article 38.36 Rule 404 (b) . li Federal statutes . 5th AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 2, 14 6th AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION @, 3s ; 24th AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 2 iii