Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely 'intelligent appellate review'

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely “intelligent appellate review”””. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 34 (1992). 2. Whether the summary disposition by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals of Petitioner’s Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(S) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was justified under Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962) and Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59 (1971).