Whether Wilson's warrantless arrest and detention without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment

QUESTION(s) PRESENTED ‘ 1) Whether, Wilsoa!s Warraantless Arrest and Detention WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE violates the Fourth Amendment, NOT ONLY when it precedes, but also when it follows the start of THE JUDICIAL PROCESS in a criminal!case:. Manuel v.City Of Joliet, Illinois,137 $.6t.911,197 L.Ed.2d 312(2017) . Wilson argues that,he was DETAINEDS that is to say,SEIZED in the : Cook County Jail for over Two Years(990) Days,and in thelTlLindisiDe. a partment OffCorrections for over Twenty Years (Since February 2000). Based on FALSIFIED POLICE REPORTS and a FABRICATED DNA ANALYSIS. In violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from UNREASONABLE SEIZURE. The prosecution's reference to the BROAD DATA BASE used by (The State's ; Expert Witness), produced an INACCURATE FREQUENCY ESTIMATE for petitions ' er Wilson's subgroup. The MULTIPLCATION METHOD used by (The State's Expert Witness), greatly magnified the error. ; . , ; ; The resulting Statistical Probability for petitioner Wilson's ENTIRE ; DNA PATTERN may be in error by THREE OR MORE orders of magnitude (e.g. ; -1 in 49,000 could really be 1 in 49). The state's expert witness Statistical Probability Methods resulted in “TREMENDOUS ERRORS" and should not have been used without more EMPIRICAL : DATA. 2) Whether, the 4th Amendment PROHIBITS government officials from detaining petitioner Wilson in THE ABSENCE CF PROBABLE CAUSE. Which happened where the police held Wilson in custody on a WARRANTLESS ARREST, On:June 9th,1997. Without any reason before the Formal Onset of a criminal whether the 4th Amendment violation also oceurred when the LEGAL PROCESS WENT WRONG. . . ; Where, the GRAND JURY's probable Cause determination was predicated . __ solely on the false statements of the Police Officer, and the state's . Expert Witness,FABRICATED / INACCURATE DNA ANALYSIS. II . . , Therefore, Whether,petitioner Wilson has been confined without CONSTI=. . TUTIONALLY ADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION. Where, the JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, has gone forward, but it has déne nothing to satisfy the 4th amendment's probable cause requirement. For that reason the UNLAWFUL JUDICIAL PROS:=S CESS cannot: extinguish the 4th Amendment Violation. : , 3) Whether, petitioner Wilson's detention was NOT SUPPORTED BY PROBABLE CAUSE because the judge's PRELIMINARY HEARING ORDER holding Wilson for _ trial was based only on "POLICE FABRICATIONS" (The State's Expert Wits<< ness = FABRICATED / INACCURATE DNA ANALYSIS). Therefore, Wilson's DETENTION IS UNREASONABLE in violation of the 4th Amendment. 4) Whether,the prosecution's use of PERJURED TESTIMONY to procure (THE , INDICIMENT, THE CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT) of “petitioner Wilson, is : : as INCONSISTENT with the RUDIMENTARY DEMANDS OF JUSTICE as is the ; obtaining of a like result by intimidation. . “Moreover, whether,misconduct of this type that results in a wrongful conviction also violates petitioner Wilson's right to DUE PROCESS UNDER THE RUBRIC of Brady v. Maryland,373 U.S.83,83 S.Ct.1194(1963) and Kyles ‘ v. Whitley, 514 U.S.419,115 $.6t141555(1905) where, government officials SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE OF THE FABRICATION. . 5) Whether, The ‘Cook County, Illinois,State's Attorney and Chicago ; Police CONCEALMENT of the Illinois State Police (FORENSIC BIOLOGY’ / DNA oo PROCEDURES MANUAL). ; = oO Interferred with petitioner Wilson's rights of ACCESS TO THE COURTS. By the aetionssof¢state agents who INTENTIONALLY CONCEALED the true facts about the ALLEGED CRIME. / ; : ; Therefore, whether these state actions are a deprivation of Wilson's constitutional rights. ; i 6) Whether,petitioner Wilson,has.been the recipient of THE CONSTRUCTIVE DENIAL OF THE EFFECTIVE. ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. Due to OFFICIAL INTER. ; FERENCE with the defense. Also, an ACTUAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST, between petitioner Wilson and court appointed counsel of record. United States v ; . JIT . v. Cronic,466 U.S.648,104 v. Washington, 466 , U.S.668,104 S.CT.2052(1984). 7) Whether,petitioner Wilson, was DEPR