What statute or authority do California Supreme Court judges have to violate, ignore, and disobey the absolute commands in the state and U.S. constitutions and laws?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; * * CAPITAL CASE * * 4. California's, Constitution (Art. VI.§14) clarifies_A COMMAND upon the Judicial Branch as follows: “Decisions of the Supreme Court and courts of appeal that determine cases SHALL be in writing with reasons stated." The Oath to obtain Vested Authority of a Judge is founded upon “oath" to perform ALL duties incumbant upon the Constitution and Laws. (a) What Statute or Authority does the California Supreme , Court Judges HAVE to violate, ignore and disobey the Absolute Commands in the State's and United States 7 Constitutions and Laws? (As was done in this case). 2. California's Constitution (Art. V. §13) clarifies, The Attorney General to be the Chief Law Officer "in charge” to enforce the laws, to obey and uphold ALL the Laws, and to ensure All the Laws are being equally enforced-adequately applied. It ES the Attorney Generals Duty to Prosecute Violators of the Laws. (a) Is it A Crime-Violation of Law.and Constitutional Rights when Judges ignore, disobey and violate the Mandatory Commands in the Constitution and Laws of the State and United States They Swore an Oath to Obey and Uphold? (b) Does the Attorney General Have Discretion to disobey, ignore Their Duty to Prosecute, and allow criminal violations against the Constitution and Laws to go "“un-, prosecuted and uncorrected" because the Violators are State Judges? Or is the Attorney General Bound by Law and Duty of Vested Authority to correct and prosecute? it 2