No. 19-8447

Jeanette D. Davis v. Renee Thomas, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process equal-protection excessive-force grievance-interference grievance-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2020-06-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were us cha 1.Defendant Officer Renee Thomas inflicted crule an unusal punishment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Aw ache A Were us cha 1.Defendant Officer Renee Thomas inflicted crule an unusal punishment | when she excessively sprayed me with Chemical Agent directly in the eyes while I posed no threat my hands where in the air I had already surrendered.Which has caused permenant damage to my eyes/health then placed in non-contact cage without . providing a solution to rinse my eyes nor skin even though I comp4ined of irritation, burning, pain and temporary blindness. “oe A. Defendant violated my 14th Amendment right to due process of law during the ticket writing process when she falsified documents; she (Officer Thomas)stated she saw/ was their during the altercation Yideo footage was requested during Thomas also changed the time of the incedent on the ticket. 2.Defendant Hammon (nurse) inflicted 8th Amendment violation of crule an unusal punishment when she(nurse Hammon)did not treat me although I asked for medical assistance.I stated to nurse Hammon “TI can not see im burning" my eyes and face where burning. Nurse Hammon stated"theirs nothing she could do, ft'll go away" Thus fo I was not allowed any opportunity for decontamination which is delibrate indiffrance. 3.Defendant Millicent Warren was respondant to grievance Id# an WHV/2014/01/49 -28E had opportunity to mrect these injustices through review and investigation of Step II.grievances. 4.Defendant Alan Greason had opportunity to correct these in“ustices through review an investigation of Step I. grievances. 5.Defendant V.Gauzi after filing a grievance for the excessive classificati to segragation in again classified to ADM seg. without notice is due process violated after prisoner Flournoy was released,causing 14th Amendment Equal Protection violation. 6.Defendant C.White had opportunity to address an resolve grievaires. 7.Defendant Daniel Heyns had opportunity to oversee all grievances and issues. 8.Defendant Bragg/Boa interferance with processing and resolving StepI,II grievances violated Plantiffs right to resolve grievance, 1st amendment Right to Redress grievances violation.

Docket Entries

2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-15
Waiver of right of respondents Renee Thomas, Vincent Gauci, Katherine Hammons to respond filed.
2020-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2020)

Attorneys

Jeanette D. Davis
Jeanette D. Davis — Petitioner
Jeanette D. Davis — Petitioner
Renee Thomas, Vincent Gauci, Katherine Hammons
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent