Whether the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit erred by denying a certificate of appealability regarding the United States District Court issuing a judgment that procedurally forecloses a jurisdictional remedy, defect correction, or error correction, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \, Whether the Court of Appeals for tre Fittn Civcurk evred by denying a certificate of appealability Pegavding the Unitek States District Couct \ssuing a judgment-thet eroceducally forecloses a jJerisdickional vem edy, defect correction, or Aeter~ Mincction, in Violation of tne Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of tne Unite Stites. a+ Whether tne Fite Circuit Court of Appecits evved hy denying & certi~vicate of appeclabi lity when jurisdiction as a fundamertatl Systemic facet of American Juris prudence Yrelded+re a proceduval judgment of tre denial of velies requested for the lack of subject ; matter jurisdiction, im violation of the Fouvteenth Amewlmene Xe Fhe Construction of tne United States. 3. Wwrether the tuoi oF & proceduval bar eeing used nthe couvts below ro dismiss a case violates tne Que Precess Clause of he Four— Teenth Amendment tothe Constitution of the United States when the frame of sulsject matter jurisdiction 1s laid before the Court W, Whether thee 15 a demarcation line between a filed 60(b)(4) motion, Federal Rules Civil Proceduvey anda 18 K-S.c. § 2254 habeas Corpus proceeding thet the court's ere ssing thereof Vesu\ts Anviolating Ahe Fourteenth Amendment te the Constvrution of the United Stetes. ° ‘