Can federal judges intentionally err to conceal economic espionage

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Can federal judge’s intentionally error to conceal economic espionage subject 18 U.S.C. §§ 1832, 2382 questions harms country and citizen’s presents three refined ; questions in this evolution of Petition for Writ of Certiorari originating 17-6008. I. © In anon intervened 31 U.S.C. § 3729 qui tarn, federal recovery value > | $10,000 this relator original source at 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1)(c)(3) is contracted by Northern California District Chief United States Attorney {retired} to steward investigation and recover said theft, in this assignment confirmed by U.S. Dept. of Justice, recognized by Congress at U.S. Constitution 9", acknowledged by Federal | Circuit on attributed ORDER, in parallel can in-District Judge’s vicariously make | their own law to “limit status and rights of person initiating [said] action” stating | in related ORDERS designated original source is “not a relator” and the “United . : States is no way involved”? II. Can Federal and Ninth Circuit Judges negate, and U.S. attorneys operating , . within Northern California District disregard the Congressional False Claims Act on techniques that aid to abet corporate ‘price fix’ procurement overcharge theft ‘from the United States General Services Administration at 15 U.S.C § 1, 15 and ~ ; 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 1341, 1956, 1962c, Title 48 §§ 303, 3.303. , III. At FRCP 60(d)(3) can jurists stir up confusion in the very legal services market original source is directed by U.S. Attorney for securing qui tarn counsel? No private attorney will risk representing the federal government when Judges ; manufacture their “un-relator”’. This novel swindle presents an exceptional question on devices this 25 year federal investigator fears will rapidly spread, promoted by defendant political placements in and beyond Northern California District, stifling Federal False Claims Act relators, related investigations, federal , theft recoveries’ across the country. — . 2