Can a judge rely on facts not found by a jury to enhance a sentence after this Court's decision in United States v. Alleyne, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), where this Court made McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79 (1986), non-controlling?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | ACTER RECENT SUPREME Co COURT RULING IN UNTIED STATES. WAY Mona, 429 $.CT 23692 049) CAN A SVDGE RELTE ON FACTS NOT FOUND —__BYASoRYTO ENBANCEA SENTENCED ZTL__APTER THIS CouRTS..DECTSION-IN UNETED STATES V. ALLENNG, 570.08, 19.2043), WHERE TRIS COURT MADE MCCTLLEN V.PENNSYIVANTA 477 WLS. 19.4926), NON-CONTROLLING, CAN THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE _ENTOENCE STANDARD BE USED AT SENTENCING WHERE A SINGLE EACT TL. _BECAnse _(hcmTLLan v. PENNEY VANTA UTLULS. 79 (1996). IS NO. LONGER CONTROLLING, CANTHES COURTS RULING TN U.S. v. WATTS, 54 a eee OI a a a)