Ronald D. Veteto v. Dewayne Estes, Warden, et al.
Was the petitioner denied meaningful and effective access to the Alabama courts?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; ‘ Was fe ; 1a ner Verero dence. hers co oft fuks ( V1 Bt fo meaning tel and fciive access fe hee Alabama cour 5 6 Ee > actessto The reson law Ls bea ry and a) Wesrlaw and othe odee Kah lio — Gatron/ accoutrements, or (3) the apoorutment of . B Competent couns La represent hh he” ’ Wes Pe it; sate Venere denied pes statutory re) recece thtgrma pauperiS (4 yo lgtye ofthe Dd Pracess and (pi 4 TOW 3 = 2! Protect on Clause. rhe Fourteenth Andrhent, tees Soke bth C, Did the Tre al ud ae. viglafe RAL aer Vereto?s | Due Fre caps aud Ggral Profechoy, US Conch tic: bes avd » When he d. aved Verere notiee of The hearix “ean EPertan be oO” ose the Defi ndaxtge a) De Was Judge Gregory O. GRIFFIN, Chrcucdd | cet disqualifies ad ef e/ ne err whey he : > y | strated racial bietrye 2 (© lemon a