Whether the court of appeals can exercise jurisdiction over the petitioner's interlocutory appeal before the imposition of an unconstitutional sentence, or final judgment, from a final decision denying his motion to dismiss/terminate his case, on a double jeopardy claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; WHEN 4 PETITIONER HAS REALIZED, Two YCARS LATER, THAT HE HAS BEN AlQWTED MiP “TRIAL OF /¥ USC. § 134 AND UNCONSTITA TION ALLA RETRIED POR THE SAME STATU TOR Y OFFCMSE y IN THE SAME PROCGEDING , WHICH HAS LEAD Té — AS |MPROFER CONVICTION / CAN TRE CourRT OF AYFEALS «EXER USE JURISDICTION OVER HIS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAR LY PEFORE THE IMPOSITION) OF AN UNCOMSTITUTIOMAL SHUTENCE, OR “FivaL JUDGMENT; FRoM A “FINAL DEWSION” DayinG HIS MOTioA) Fo Dismiss ) TErMWATE JY S CASE, /70 ACC ORDMIE CITE THE LAW, OA! A DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAIM, AFACT THAT “Te GOVIUMEOT HAS AOMTIED Te?