No. 19-8486
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights fourth-amendment law-enforcement marijuana-legalization police-encounter probable-cause search-and-seizure standard-of-review unreasonable-seizures
Latest Conference:
2020-06-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are minott ties and pool people in America provided adequate protection from unreasonable Searches and Seizures?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Q) Are minott ties and pool people in America provided adequate protection From vareasonable Searches and Seizures TP Does the Fourth Amendment of the US. Constitution truly apply to Evermene in Amevica © Why wes petitioner, Quiney Tremayne Bloodworths Ciahts really vMislate d Pr ; . How can +he Standard of ‘review, with respect +o Fourth Amendment claims | be changed ato make it mere fair and jest Pr . \ uw Q) Shovid the ‘ Swre | of mari wana still constitute. q probable cause afters it has heen deerminalized P
Docket Entries
2020-06-15
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2020)
2020-03-06
Application (19A973) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 4, 2020.
2020-02-24
Application (19A973) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 5, 2020 to May 4, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth — Petitioner
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent