No. 19-8491
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights clerk-liability constitutional-rights court-record-falsification due-process falsification-of-record judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation standing state-tort-claim
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the overt conduct of the Clerk of the Georgia Supreme Court and lower state courts to falsify the record of a court proceeding deprives a pro se litigant of rights, privileges, or immunities guaranteed under the Constitution or laws of the United States and/or creates a state tort claim against the clerk?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the overt conduct of the Clerk of the Georgia Supreme Court and lower state courts to falsify the record of a court proceeding deprives a pro se litigant of rights, privileges, or immunities guaranteed under the Constitution or laws of the United States and/or creates a state tort claim against the clerk?. i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2020)