No. 19-8500

David Furtado Gray v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-06-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the term "pattern of Racketeering Activity" as defined in 18 U.S.C.D. 1959(a), which cross references to 18 U.S.C.S. 1961, proved more of simple understanding, intelligence "for parties, order the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, of which is prohibited, or does it render it unconstitutionally vague?

Whether "Pattern" of Racketeering Activity as defined in 18 U.S.C.S. 1959(a) and U.S.C.S. 1961, whether the District Court lack Subject Matter Jurisdiction in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution?

Whether Murder as defined in 18 U.S.C.S. 1, Order Federal Law Cross Reference cannot support a violation of U.S.C.S. 1594(c) Correct Application of the Categorical Approach?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Moe Necen 'Qdeor' & Tarheleern est a2 AcKees is \\B VSO. Vsa@Wy, ako is Cross Kelerersetr Xe (QO

Docket Entries

2020-06-15
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 18, 2020)

Attorneys

David Gray
David Furtado Gray — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent