Whether 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil-rights claims based on 4th-amendment illegal-search-and-seizure are barred under Heck-v-Humphrey, collateral-estoppel, or qualified-immunity

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether a 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights action based on Fourth Amendment illegal search and seizure claims are barred under the Doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey, : 512 U.S. 477 (1994) where the illegal searches and seizures at issue on appeal failed to uncover evidence of criminal activity and therefore, cannot imply the invalidity of the plaintiff's outstanding criminal conviction; II. whether a 42 U-S.C. §1983 civil rights action based on Fourth Amendment illegal search and seizure claims are barred under.the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel where the the illegal searches and seizures. at: issue on appeal were never heard and determined by a prior court of competent jurisdiction; III. Whether a 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights action based on Fourth Amendment illegal search and seizure claims are barred under’ the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity "where the illegal searches and seizures at issue on appeal clearly demonstrated that the state actor's conduct was not objectively reasonable under clearly established laws at the time of the violation; IV. Whether the Court's below violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by denying the plaintiff's motions to compel discovery where the Court's were provided an abundance of information demonstrating that the requested nonpriviliged discoverable information would leave no question that the state actor's illegal searches and seizures were performed in knowing violation of clearly established law. :