No. 19-852

Maxell, Ltd. v. Fandango Media, LLC

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 35-usc-101 alice-corp-v-cls-bank alice-test content-access content-access-control digital-media network-transmission online-streaming patent-eligibility time-controls
Key Terms:
Patent Copyright
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the claims at issue in Maxell's patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Maxell, Ltd., is a leading manufacturer of digital media. It owns patents that disclose solutions for managing access to audio/video content sent over networks, such as videos provided through online rental and streaming services. The patents describe two time controls and a series of rules to restrict access to audio/visual files that are sent with the files, in order to limit access to the files even when the user is offline. The question presented is: Whether the claims at issue in Maxell’s patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014).

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-24
Reply of petitioner Maxell, Ltd. filed.
2020-02-07
Brief of respondent Fandango Media, LLC in opposition filed.
2020-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Fandango Media, LLC
Steven LiebermanRothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Respondent
Maxell, Ltd.
Nicole A. SaharskyMayer Brown LLP, Petitioner