Whether a prima facie case and pretext-plus proof of discriminatory animus is sufficient for discovery, summary judgment, or finding employment discrimination under Title VII

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Whether the District Court and Tenth Circuit erred in holding that a plaintiff establishing a prima facie case and or showing pretext plus proof of the employer's discriminatory animus to meet the burden of proof for a finding of employment discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act is not sufficient to compel discovery per a plaintiff's discovery requests and Motion to Compel. (2) Whether the District Court and Tenth Circuit erred in holding that a plaintiff ; establishing a prima facie case and or showing pretext plus proof of the employer's discriminatory animus to meet the burden of proof for a finding of employment discrimination is not sufficient to grant a plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement or otherwise rule in favor of a plaintiff for a plaintiff's claims under Title Vil of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. (3) Whether the District Court and Tenth Circuit erred in granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement without compelling discovery per Plaintiff's discovery requests and Motion to Compel or else erred in not granting Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgement or otherwise ruling in Plaintiff's favor based upon the pretext-plus rule and or Plaintiff establishing a prima facie case.