Whether the Sixth Circuit's reasoning concerning the petitioner's attempt to get new counsel assigned during trial is flawed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 41. The Sixth Circuit reasoning concerning Petitioners : attempt to get new counsel assigned during trial is flawed, as several United States Supreme Court holdings carrectly captures the requirements of : Strickland v Washington. . : 2. The Sixth Circuit reasoning as it relates to Petitioners second claim that a reasonable jurists would not disagree with District Ceurts decision to not give an instruction on a lesser included offense is flawed. 3. The Sixth Circuit argument that Petitioners : ‘ ineffective ~ assistance of appellate ~ counsel claim is not worth review is flawed. Here Petitioner laid out foundation as to why this claim should be : granted. , 4, Did lewer Courts make erroneous rulings on petitioners amended claims on petitioners initial motion for relief from judgment (6.500), without fully mastering the record and thus denying petitioner access to the courts by State never praviding a Opinion and Order in Rule 5 material. Completely going against U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Set forth in AMADEO v ZANT. LIST OF ALL PARTIES Petitioner herein is AARON L. DANIELS. The Respondent is LORI GIDLEY who is the warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, where Petitioner was incarcerated at the time he filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus, and is located at: 1500 Caberfae Huy, Manistee, Michigan 49660. Respondent is representedby Jared Schultz who is of the Attorney General Office located at: Michigan Dapartment of Attorney General, P.G. Box 30217, Lansing, MI 48909.