No. 19-8524

Gregory Preston Coker, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 4th Circuit misapplied the standard in Madisyn vs. Whed to determine if the SIC Code 474-53-375 is applicable to a Qualified Affordable Defendant Predicate (i)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) whethen The 4th Ciaturt Mmisagolico Std Sun J vs, Madtisy VS whed =+ Dettamiven the Sic Code 4Y4-S3-375 hs pyiuxble + A Qunl Fy a) (Ancen bFfenden Preoicate 7 (i)

Docket Entries

2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Gregory Preston Coker
Gregory Preston Coker Jr. — Petitioner
Gregory Preston Coker Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent