Whether the prosecutor's remarks during rebuttal of injecting personal opinion and vouching for the credibility of a witness

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Whedher She remarles ducing prosecutei¢ rebuttal of injechng perSonal opinion @ Vouching for its Yeey Witnessed Credibility on invited vesponse' at" invited eply" 10 defese Counsel's argument, : 2. hte Pre Ubjechon Yo Samat Can be nade £ ules Counsel inelYoctve or Pilar y Objeck, . 3. Whether Yue personal opinion & Vouching he Qredibs ity A se roe Ine Stes wihss ie Ws pte of vile se 4 he sel oF _ | Lb 4. Whedhay fhe FeView Yo ising ined fechive as at of Cos for rami i 0 Claim of presetutoria| miscorduel a noridutional issue hurt 1 genera We | 5, whether any alleged prejudice font Jie proSeoifor’s femarks Wer Cured by She a Courts general Jory iinstruchons. ; weed the veil of G. Whelner The oekthoner was donied a Phir drial when Hn eel ve . i” ever S ji nual © esl rae» guy Viera” vn | J LWhedner Constructive possession dlone enaugh Ww establish me wena mete pviibef_ “bp Suppress evidence Was dimely mady prior 10 rial. g. Whether a not +o me vk A Pull and fair \biontion of a Clam G, Whether peltioner was provided an oppor tunity tor 5 linder Yne Fourth havanden : r 10, Whether, afer Ovoved an Unretonable delay the buck of prob shif J the Jovernvient te domouslrote Ye existence af a bona Sp energnty or obey ertnord nary Circumstance to justify Se delay, , | | |. Whelhrthe Last reasoned Cour} order is am biguous 4s whether t dented > Petitioner's Claims of inefPeehve assistance F Counsed ce b a procedural deeult OF denied ovidhe merits. wi