Whether the petitioner can seek relief under 42 USC §1983, 1985, or 1986 for alleged conspiracy to withhold exculpatory evidence

No question identified. : QUESTIONS TO BE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: . 1. WHETHER OR NOT I CAN PETITION THE COURT FOR RELIEF AND OR AN INJUNCTION UNDER OUR CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE TITLE 42 USCS § 1983, 1985, OR 1986 WHEN THE PROSECUTOR, COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER, AND MY DEFENSE ATTORNEY CONSPIRED TOGETHER THROUGH THE 'USE OF PERJURY AS A [W]EAPON' WHERE THEY HAD PURPOSEFULLY WITHHELD “EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE" BY FAILING TO ADMIT THE SAID EVIDENCE AS AN EXHIBIT? 2. IS THE UNITED STATES CONSEITUTION AND IT'S AMENDMENTS ' A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE CAPABLE OF BEING INFORCED THROUGH EQUITY AND LAW -AND/OR THROUGH A BREACH OF CONTRACT "RIGHTS?" 3. HOW COME I COULDN"T HAVE TOOKEN JUDICIAL NOTICE OF MY STATE-COURT PROCEEDINGS WHERE THE JUDGE WENT AGAINST THE LAW DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA AND" ISSUE PRECLUSION IMMEDIATELY IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CALIMING THAT MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED AND WHERE I REPEADELY PETITIONED THE SUPREME COURT _ FOR RELIEF?