No. 19-854

Universal Telephone Exchange, Inc. v. ZTE Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2020-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-award arbitration-law federal-arbitration-act fraud fraud-standard legal-integrity revised-uniform-arbitration-act statutory-interpretation texas-civil-practices-and-remedies-code undue-means uniform-arbitration-act
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does an admission by a party of contemporaneous illegal activity at the time of the issues in dispute in arbitration, or contemporaneous with the time of the arbitration, or both times, or admission of illegal activities affecting the integrity of adjudicative processes establish "fraud, corruption or undue means" sufficient to vacate an arbitration award under FAA Section 10(a)(1), Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code Section 171.088(a)(1) Uniform Arbitration Act Section 12, or Revised Uniform Arbitration Act Section 23?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an admission by a party of contemporaneous illegal activity establish 'fraud, corruption or undue means' sufficient to vacate an arbitration award?

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Universal Telephone Exchange, Inc.
Richard D. FaulknerFaulkner ADR Law, Petitioner
ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA, Inc.
Jeffrey Scott LevingerLevinger PC, Respondent