Universal Telephone Exchange, Inc. v. ZTE Corporation, et al.
Does an admission by a party of contemporaneous illegal activity at the time of the issues in dispute in arbitration, or contemporaneous with the time of the arbitration, or both times, or admission of illegal activities affecting the integrity of adjudicative processes establish "fraud, corruption or undue means" sufficient to vacate an arbitration award under FAA Section 10(a)(1), Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code Section 171.088(a)(1) Uniform Arbitration Act Section 12, or Revised Uniform Arbitration Act Section 23?
Does an admission by a party of contemporaneous illegal activity establish 'fraud, corruption or undue means' sufficient to vacate an arbitration award?