No. 19-8541

Haider Salah Abdulrazzak v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles

Lower Court: South Dakota
Docketed: 2020-05-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-filing fed-r-app-p-4c1 federal-regulations first-amendment fourteenth-amendment inmate-filing inmates-rights supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether under the Supremacy Clause, the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, states are permitted to dissociate themselves from Federal regulations and statutes that protect inmates' timely filing in court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether under the Supremacy Clause, the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, states are permitted to dissociate themselves from Federal regulations and statutes that protect inmates’ timely filing in court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) 2. Whether State statutes which permit a non-inmates filing in state’s courts on the day of its mailing should be applied equally to incarcerated inmates filing in state courts. 3. Whether state statures which permit a non-inmate filing in state court after the dead-line due to state court's oversight should equally applied to incarcerated inmates. 4. Whether state statutes or regulations pursuant to sub paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 constitute adequate grounds to deny Petitioner other Federal relieves.

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles to respond filed.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Haider Salah Abdulrazzak
Haider Salah Abdulrazzak — Petitioner
Haider Salah Abdulrazzak — Petitioner
South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles
Catherine SchlimgenSouth Dakota Department of Corrections, Respondent
Catherine SchlimgenSouth Dakota Department of Corrections, Respondent