1. Whether a successor to a judge that retired may refuse to consider a Rule 60(b)(1) motion on the grounds that he does not reconsider orders entered by a prior judge.

2. Whether a Rule 60(b)(1) petition may be filed within a year after the judgment is entered, as stated in the rule, or within 14 days as stated by the judge before whom the motion for reconsideration was made.

3. Whether the judgment below should be summarily reversed due to its clear conflict with settled rules of law.

4. Whether the underlying action was a non-core proceeding, thus precluding the bankruptcy judge from entering a final determination, and requiring her to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court for entry of judgment.

Whether a successor to a judge that retired may refuse to consider a Rule 60(b)(1) motion on the grounds that he does not reconsider orders entered by a prior judge