No. 19-8560
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure court-order criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion legal-appeal motion-correction self-representation sentencing transcript transcript-error
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
did-court-err-and-abuse-discretion-by-erroneously-quashing-as-untimely-petitioner's-pro-se-appeal
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : _ fetitiones iS WO ng fully Convuictedancda Juvensle £,'fer who /s representing him self, . QUESTION PKESENTED Fok REVIEW . , DID CouRT ERR AND ABUSE DISCRETION BY ERKONEOUSLY QUASHING AS UNTEMELY PETLTIONER 5 OY YRolE(Pocketed OY YAoIE) AMPEAL OF TRIAL CovhT’S O8R8/2°/8 ORDER DENNING /107LON FOR COR REC T£ZON OF KESENTENCE HEARING TRANSCREPT © | G) | List of facties [VW] All parties appear in the cagt)or1 OF thiS Case ON Cover page, Ge | 7] TABLE TENTS
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 29, 2020)