No. 19-8565

Christopher S. Andersen v. Jeri Taylor

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the test for granting a Certificate of Appealability in a habeas action on an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim must incorporate the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), test

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the test for granting a Certificate of Appealability in a habeas action on an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim must incorporate the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), test for whether trial counsel was ineffective (i.e., whether the petitioner has shown that, but for the deficient performance, there is a reasonable likelihood that the outcome would have been different), or, whether it may incorporate a more demanding test (e.g., the test the District Court employed in this case, whether the petitioner has shown that, but for the deficient performance, the outcome would have been different). i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-17
Waiver of right of respondent Jeri Taylor to respond filed.
2020-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 29, 2020)

Attorneys

Christopher Andersen
Oliver LoewyFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Oliver LoewyFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Jeri Taylor
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent