No. 19-8566
John Charles Thompson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggregate-imprisonment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process imprisonment plain-error revocation sentencing sentencing-guidelines supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was it plain error for the Western District of North Carolina to not aggregate Mr. Thompson's multiple revocation active imprisonment sentences then reduce the amount of time on supervised release by the aggregate amount of active imprisonment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Was it plain err for the Western District of North Carolina to not aggregate Mr. Thompson’s multiple revocation active imprisonment sentences then reduce the amount of time on supervised release by the aggregate amount of active imprisonment?
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 29, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent