No. 19-8569
Brandon S. Wilson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) 18-usc-3553a abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process procedural-error sentencing sentencing-reasonableness supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is Mr. Wilson's sentence procedurally and substantively infirm because the district court failed to consider the factors under 18 USC §3553(a) or offer reasons for the sentence it imposed?
2. Was Mr. Wilson's admission to violating supervised release unknowing and involuntary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Mr. Wilson's sentence procedurally and substantively infirm because the district court failed to consider the factors under 18 USC §3553(a) or offer reasons for the sentence it imposed?
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Brandon S. Wilson
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent