No. 19-8576
Franklin Mackensie Robinson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-record court-of-appeals criminal-case criminal-procedure federal-grand-jury federal-jurisdiction grand-jury jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge statutory-compliance title-40-usc-s-255
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Petitioner entitled to review the Administrative Record?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is the Petitioner, Mr. Franklin Robinson, entitled to review . The Administrative Record in his criminal case used by The United States of America in order to establish it's jurisdiction over the Petitioner? ' Did the United States of America comply with the statutory mandate of Title 40 U.S.C.S. 255 (CF. 40 U.S.C.S 3112) in Petitioner's Case? Did the United States of America have jurisdiction over : Petitioner to prosecute him using nothing, but State Evidence ; , in a Federal Grand Jury? _ : Did the COurt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erroneously deny Petitioner's appeal? 7 7
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent