No. 19-8589
Ramon Enrique Acosta v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review plea-bargaining sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurists could debate the district court's determination that trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective with respect to the government's plea offer
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether reasonable jurists could debate the district court’s determination that trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective with respect to the government’s plea offer. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Ramon Enrique Acosta
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent