Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether “officer safety” can justify the seizure of a person for a Terry stop, instead of pointing to specific, articulable facts that lead him to reasonably suspect that criminal activity may be afoot? Second, in 2000, this Court held that headlong flight from police officers, in a high crime area, was sufficient reasonable suspicion for an officer to seize a person, pursuant to Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000). The question presented is: Whether “walking away” from police, in a high crime area, without any suspicion that a person is engaged in criminal activity, can provide officers a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity? ii
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-05
Reply of petitioner Justin Harrington Darrell filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 21, 2020.
2020-08-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2020 to September 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 17, 2020.
2020-07-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 17, 2020 to August 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-06-17
Response Requested. (Due July 17, 2020)
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)