No. 19-8595

Brandon Williams v. Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Governor of Maryland, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: bill-of-rights civil-rights constitutional-supremacy due-process federalism judicial-review negligence standing state-statute takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does state statutes supersede the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does statutes of the State of Maryland supersede and/or override the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights? 2. Is the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights deemed as Supreme law of the land over State statutes? 3. Has the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit exceeded its enumerated powers and violated basic principles of federalism and cause further confusion with no consideration taken of the multiple violations made by Respondents; STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of the Governor; BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, as described in my case, and rushed to judgment and dismissed it : based on biasness and not being impartial? Maddox v. State, 32 Ga. 587, 79 Am.Dec. 307; Pierson v. State, 18 Tex.App. 558, also Yarbrough v. Mallory, 225 Ala. 579, 144 $0,447, 448 and Evans v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County, 107 Cal.App. 372, 290 P. 662, 665. 4. Was it not due to negligence, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1986 that Respondent; STATE OF MARYLAND, et. al, in which they had the power to prevent or aid in preventing such wrongful doings which makes them liable to Petitioner for the injuries ensued? Cullinan v. Burkhard, 41 Mise.Rep. 321, 84 N.Y.S. 825. 5. Was it not Respondents legal representatives for all damages caused by such wrongful acts, by which such “persons” by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of “persons” guilty 1 of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in this action? See, Schneider v. C. H. Little Co., 184 Mich. 315, 151 N.W. 587, 588; Hulley v. Moosbrugger, 88 N.J.L. 161, 95 A. 1007, 1010, L.R.A. 1916C, 1203; and Krom y. Antigo Gas Co., 154 Wis. 528, 143 N.W. 163, 164 . 6. As in accordance with the Bill of Rights: A. Does Amendment 4 protect me from unreasonable searches and seizures? B. Does Amendment 5 provide me protection of rights to life, liberty and property? C. Does Amendment 6 provide me the right to face my accuser and cross examine in criminal cases? D. Does Amendment 7 give me rights in Civil cases to sue at common law and not be deprived under color of law? E. Does Amendment 8 forbid excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments? F. Does Amendment 9 provide other rights kept by me, not to be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by me? G. Does Amendment 10 provide undelegated powers kept by the States and the people? H. Does Amendment 13 forbid slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted and that Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation? I. Does Amendment 14 provide Citizenship rights, that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Brandon Williams
Brandon Williams — Petitioner
Brandon Williams — Petitioner