No. 19-8603

Melvin P. White, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-docket-entry civil-procedure constitutional-challenge district-court-procedure federal-court-jurisdiction magistrate-judge magistrate-judge-review notice-and-certification procedural-standards record-keeping standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court fail to enter a petition for review by the Supreme Court, causing the exclusion of a prior order for money owed in the civil docket?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : “i , — ACLOROING TO ER.cv O19 RERDS KEPT BY THE CiIERK, CCWil docket), Did THE US.DISIRET CF. CITRK EAI TH ENTER PETITION FoR REVIEW ST. CT, CASENG LXCYDI6T FUOCE ORDER FoR MONEY OWED IN THE cai DOCKET 7 “PCLoRDIWE TC FR Gv.P. 720) StREDARD CF Revit W FoR THE US OiStricl CT. . tnt IZ USC 3G (BG)UW) -A RECCRD Must BC MALT ct au EV(OCOTARY PROCEEDINGS, DID US. DisRUT CT MAGISTRATE JUOGC NamBers FAC “TO COMPLY WWHHti THE US, DISTRICT CT. SrA DARD oF REVIEW ? “ACCORDING TO F.V.CvP. S.1 ComstrtencwAl CHRUESCE TO A STATUE , nonce “CERMTCATION BHD WEVELTEN 18 REQUIRED oF THE HTH CIR. CT OF , “APPEAIS AND U.S. ATTY, GEN WiliAM BARe on APPEAL, IS HE 31 COFR. “IRS. REC CoyeRWinG THE PRACTICE CF AtTORNEYS oHSIDERED f PuBlishEd AOE? DokS tT WCWDE THE Us.? STATE OF. CASE NO [FCVDIGT JUBGMENT FLED ETB .G 19 _ MEI CWT IR. VS_US IWTEONAL REVEAL SERVICE US DISTRICT CT. CASE WO 2:19 -CY-9-FL* FUDGMEUT FLIED SUE G, 1% — LMetviny 2 WHE IR. VS US. INTERVA REVEN AG Senvice US. Cr. OF APPEALS YT CLR CASE WO 19-1747 TUDGMERT FuEQ Nov. 25, I9 Movin @ WOES VS.US.ATIV, CEs Wiileare BARR US. CT. OF RPPERIS MY CiR CASE WG 14-17 4 MANDATE FIED FEB .(9, 2 DMEWIN PWIKTE TR. VS. DS ATTY, GEN. itn Gane . CrTATOWS OF OPIN INS AWD ORDERS U.S. DISERICT CF. CASE WE AsHG-CV-F-FL ONDE FED TUNE 6, 19 BIVENS VS SIX DKNOLIN NAME AGGUTS OF FED. GURGAY OF NARCUTICS N23 Us . 388 C1G7), E.PAC. VS MEYER SiO US 7IGOG4) , TITIE 28 USC qs (eE)2)(B) WS. CY. OF BPPENS HT CR. CASE 2 a wna] ORDER FED Nev .25,19 “APFIQMED TAC QOAUION oF THE US. ODIRET CT, THE 28 USC 1AIS(E)(ZIC), g a GHHEMENT OF SuUSDICtioN ow URISDICTION FoR tHE US. SUREME CT. I$ BASED ON TINE 2¥ USC 2074 procedure __ AWD EVIDBWCE WHOER SECTION TIE ZF USC. 194] WHEN A QUING OF @ DistRCT.cT _ 1S. RiMAl FoR THE PURDRSE oF APPEAL, REVIEW goUctT FoR US.CT. oF APPEAIS 4H . “QAR. CARE NO. 19-1741 FUDGMENT EVTERED FES 1G, 20 YHCie.cr. oF APPERIS gy OF MANDATE FILED DECIO 19 FED.@ APP. P. AICDIL), see oo. _ __ PROVISIONS INVEIVED __WTE 3) CoFR. FED.REC. GoVERNI/NG THE PRACHCE OF ArroRRieyS 10S REC. TREAS. DEFT. NE ZF USC GRE CA))(A) FR.Cv.e, 72(b) A RECORD MUST BE MADE OF ALL EV (DENTIARY ; PROCEEDINGS, F.R.CV-P 79 REcondDS KEPPRY THE CIERK, F.R.cv.P 5) Const. CHAENCE _TO @ STATUE. 7 4 Sw eMeNT_ OF THE CASE BASIS FOR TURISDICHON THT 2F USC. 1334, N.C. CAST WE IFCUD LOT ENED FEB. io, ZOIY ORDER FoR MOWCY OWTO PROCEEDING , DISTRICT cT. JUDGE REEMA PRESIDING , FUEO PURSUANT TO TITLE Bi CoRR. 1RS_ REC. FoR FEO. Wome TRY chim _ DISAMOWANCE OF 89 030.06 Mid MENTE TARY DAMAGES Fok AS ,006,008.00 Fer _ THE ARS FAUURE TO PAY FORA OLQDD oF ID YEAKS ROLE Sic MOTION For SUMMARY , JUDGMENT WAS FAED WE THE CT. PURSUANT TO THE Bi COFR. (RS. REC. 10.1 TUDEE | DEASION, THE DEFEWOANT DID Not ANSALER OR APPEAR in CF. THE FUDGE conciuded {THE CH WACK JURISDICTION . THT CASE WAS QEKCOVED TS FED. DISTRICT CT PunSUANT TS (TUNE 2B USC LAH] CASE WE. 219-CV-9EL, LEG. 2g, 2019, THE US. DISHRICT eT. CIERK _ DI WOT ENTER THE GUDGCL DRDER CASE HO. ITCVD 17 tw THE Civil DOCKET PuRSUAKT TO i FRCV-P. 17), 79. US. MAGISTRATE THOGE NUMBER T DID NOT FollOLy THE U.S. DISHRET ler. SWMNDERD oF REVIEW FG. TECY TINE 25 USC. G36 CBIG) A) GUQHERESS 1WE EVIDEWCE US. DISTRICT CT. JUDGE KUNA GAN ADCPIED THE MAGISTRATE RECOMMENDANON TO _ DISMISS PuRsyanst TO THE 28 USC. 1945 (E)(Z)(B), THE CASE WAS THEW AEPEALED TO THE NTH Cid. CY. OF APPEARS THE REPEAL WES CCRTIFED. THE US.ATY. Cen. WLR BARR WAS , NOMHIED PuRsuant TOFREV OSL ANDY TO INTERVERE AND PRosecuTE, THE YTHCIR, ARFIRMED, THE DECISION oF THE US. DISTRICT COURT, | : ARGUMENT. “yt ATH CIR, HAS DECIDED AW iMOoR TANT FER. QucSTioW 1D A WAY THAT CONTUETS Hovis RELEVANT _DECINEAS oF THT SUELEML CT. SUPREME CT. DEciSidw ity MEAD, US, Ive MEAD CoRR 533 US, 218,121, SCF. Aiey 1SOL ED, 1d (2001) ACCORDINGLY WE HOID _UTRAT UNDER (RC CUSiVGy) A TAXPAYER Cina FoR CREDIT OR REFUND IS TIMEY IF IF is FED ——— lovin 3 YRS. FROM TAR DATE HS THOME FAY WAS FUED REGARDIESS OE WHEN THE RETURN Ilwas FED. (

Docket Entries

2020-08-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-07-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-08
Waiver of right of respondent Internal Revenue Service to respond filed.
2020-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Internal Revenue Service
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Melvin P. White, Jr.
Melvin P. White Jr. — Petitioner
Melvin P. White Jr. — Petitioner