Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the defendant's arguments

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. HALL’S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING MR. HALL’S MOTION FOR A NEW ATTORNEY. B. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. HALL’S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A SENTENCE BASED ON DRUG WEIGHT WHICH INACCURATELY OVERSTATED MR. HALL’S CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT. i