No. 19-8605
Courtland Barnes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-pornography criminal-sentencing district-court federal-appeals federal-sentencing-guidelines fourth-circuit mitigating-evidence sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's reliance on the child pornography guideline and the mitigating evidence Petitioner offered to the court require the vacating of the court's system as substantively unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the district court’s reliance on the child pornography guideline and the mitigating evidence Petitioner offered to the court require the vacating of the court’s system as substantively unreasonable.
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Courtland Barnes
Stephen Clayton Gordon — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Stephen Clayton Gordon — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent