How does the U.S. Court of Appeals hold the District Court Decision to be erroneous based on the evidence that was not proven to have occurred in the trial record?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |, How does the US$, Court of tls holds The. _ District Court Decis/on te Levin EUdence thatiAs | fet proven to have eceurred nM the lel ecard? — , Cans eall, caller Statement, mad Mit jumise be ans action) Evidence. . _ e Suidence of the Sz gi{call, the stete2 Hew ¢ parks the eve iowed to o< dowmnped on the. defense Right before the trinl Just before ary Selection F 3, How dees evidence of m warrijuanm transtohen for hhe St Time come te the Defense Attention AgHN hight loefere +A) Lohen the Defendatt asked fe ny evidence IS aKys before Trial by moeties % (this #180 came te the Defendant's Yvouledse Just — Before dry selecton). , 4 How can the UrS, Cour + of spperls Csr the Eshih Circuit Determine whht the sth Gil call-caller _. Lntentions were wwotth-ouwt nd one ASKing The Caller LobAt there intentrons weret Be 5. Do the UWS, Court of nppeals get to guess what the SAB cnt{CAller Entenhen's were? | ©. Lahat happens when whatthe 5749)) cnllee said IN “The stelement portion of the Stay callis: Unhrue, or is not isthond Enodledye nad maybe . Semestning they hemed? noore enews. . 7, What is $e be done If the pistrict+-Court Ruled in the Defendent’s favor At the pretrial Conference Qranhng me pefendonls Limine? Agamst The , evidence That the prosecutor Lownted te lbemg inte the Trial in farm af Gout That iss The seme gvidence pertaining +p the jneldent on B-A-V7 . vulich is The Same incident the SCG aallecwws phy, Sees pretrial Conference at: page 2e of. 59 Lines[)5-.Ad) wad iso The Defendanis REapms to the. — yoy(b)» | ©. How can the District Cauct Rule the wo Cran not come inte the +riel then Let itm by way of a 4) Cl] ? Cae St a cm!) , , 9. How does the Us, Court ot mppeals in the opinian ff Stoles This gil coller nm The St coll, Says The | Caller rates re Just shot atucvak, Than ths | Sate caller says hucrP harry” pes gongte , Conte lotic esith A Bem, Yow ewhy eapould I Need to Come oncic if Bm wi rendy There. Sheeting wot etre 2 f, This Pont nate vieny SinceSee page 4 First paragraph CIE) (opin/ov). | 18, How does it get by ev bed LEU QuiceSen eS Me Sresded thatrill, son bought paper funn from he, pelendant, HOt Uittt Ne OWN, of ws felld The. matifurnk Come from, Defendant, jhe sonsnid he newer bought png mntifusrn from he pefandant Wot did he Cao of wig delt awed by Wis dad, Uruk Quickbeay sr, Then — Uru Quickbeardt wlso stules The sameon he +0 wit} This brings Question to wry Ouicbears estimeny weed lbring.s Question te the prosecution Theory of why the incident Wappen in The First place, Seeretul Quick beat Sr testimony ar page |BoF lk Unes Al-AS, puge OF OF NE dines” Jas, me puge Gs oF UE Lines |-avere ort Cross erge q3 of Ie Cines )9AS, And prge 94 Of LIF Lines I. : . . |], JF & person give Vis son 20°? Jeo buy Some Wet) run Now does he owe Aor?” forthe — Seme mnptl [Umer e , . 12, Do you beheve This Ever took ploee® . , 13, Lorv hk Quicle beat It. pipnt wrnow what he Dresecakar nes halting wrbouds when wbked 1f he Knew rhe debt See: Lervr Buickbert IF. beshmony ? prg& /50 Lines (9BS trad prge bs] Cines I-49. , |