No. 19-8611
Tags: appellate-circuit-split appellate-review assault crime-of-violence dangerous-weapon due-process federal-criminal-law sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does applying this automatic rule ignore or misinterpret this Court's caselaw, given the variety of items that are classified as dangerous weapons and the variety of ways those weapons can be used?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review At least five federal appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit, have determined the use of a dangerous weapon automatically transforms assault into a crime of violence. Does applying this automatic rule ignore or misinterpret this Court’s caselaw, given the variety of items that are classified as dangerous weapons and the variety of ways those weapons can be used? ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Adam Scott
Amy B. Cleary — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent