Whether the General District and Circuit Courts of Suffolk ignored the defendant's right to Qualified-Immunity

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.Whether the General District and Circuit Courts of Suffolk ignored the defendant's right to Qualified Immunity as set forth in Hudson v. McMillian 503 U.S. 1, 6-7 & 9-10 (1992) and Hope v. Pelzer 536 U.S. 730, 739 (2002) citing Anderson v. Creighton 483 U.S. 635, 640 (1987). _ 2. Whether the Norfolk Court of Appeals and the Supremem Court of Virginia erred in affirming the erroneous decisions of the lower courts which violated the legal standard for Use of Force set by The Supreme Court of the United States as in Graham v. Connor #87-6571, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) and Whitley v. Albers #84-1077, 475 U.S. 312 (1986). 3, Whether by applying the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment and two prong . Strickland Test set by The Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, Attorney for the Defense is guilty of ineffective assistance of counsel.