When two state courts arrive at different conclusions using different governing legal principles on the same case, should the petitioner be given a rehearing?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A, When +wo State Covrts arrive at differant Conclusion Using differant governing legal principles on the same Case 7 Movld yhe Petitioner he given a rehearing 2 9. Vs iy standard for a mucder Totali ty principle to be . VsSed Wy & burglacy ~ grand larceny Case ? 3. TE the Courts ave vnable to establish thet the Petitioner ever exercised Aominton and Contra\ over Stolen isems How can one be found guilty of grand larceny and burglary ? 4, The Svereme Covet of Virginia Stated the Pediboner Was a SuSpect In anotdner crime ) Bes this et eca rele Judgment to convict ? 5. Tt the Supreme Court of Virginia States “TH is Not ® Matter of law we can find the Petitioner guilty bey ond a ceasonable Aovbt™ bor still copvicts Have the Court sit aside a lay ? 6, When Progecutor introduce priot Charges of Perhoner , Ot a differant tral does this deprive the Petitvoner Of a for trial 2