Does the law shielding judges, officers of the court and state actors from personal liability in a civil rights suit facilitate and encourage bad actors to conspire to obstruct justice, violate civil-rights and commit fraud-on-the-court?

Questions presented: 1. Does the law shielding judges, officers of the court and state actors from personal liability in a civil rights suit, in effect, facilitate and thus encourage bad actors in those positions to conspire to successfully obstruct justice, violate the civil rights of a party and commit fraud on the Court for financial and/or professional gain, as evidenced in Rumanek v. Fallon et al, D. De. No. 17-00123? 2. Is the law shielding judges from such personal liability in violation of the 15*, Ath, Sth th Oth and 14th amendment rights of their victims? Is it in contravention of “rule of law?” 3. Is Delaware state judges’ secret alteration of verbatim court proceeding transcripts as provided for and used under Delaware Codes § 4101 and 4101 and 561(d) in order to obstruct justice in the federal courts ~ as evidenced in Rumanek v . Fallon et al fraud on the court and a usurpation of this Court’s authority? Is the same in violation of the 15¢, 4%, 5th, 8th, 9th and 14th amendment rights of plaintiffs and/or defendants it is used against? See D. De. No. 17-00123 Tenth Amended Complaint at No.’s 203-234. . 4. Does plenary review of lower court decisions, by definition, protect corrupt judges and those who conspire with them to obstruct justice and commit fraud on the Court? 5. Is not any party without a background in the law functionally cognitively disabled when attempting to vindicate their civil rights in the face of corrupt judges/state actors/officers of the court colluding to deny them the same? Does the Court in effect discriminate against those with cognitive disability in such circumstances, thereby denying them equal protection of the laws? 6. Does the Court, in effect, deny pro se in forma pauperis parties who are not trained in the law equal protection of the laws and thereby discriminate based on socio-economic status? Is such discrimination legal under the U.S. Constitution and/or rule of law?