No. 19-8642

Christopher Davis v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency false-evidence grand-jury police-misconduct robbery-identification standing suppression-hearing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why was I denied the right to subpoena Indianapolis Metro Detectives to refute their falsified record to the Grand Jury?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Bs 1) Why uns denied the Right fe Subpoena Tndianapatis Metro Dectectives to +cfal ther falsified my record 40 Fhe Grand Jury, Stating that 2 had pass “Gun 4 Robbe fapFtal Mureler “ . €enyletions which Is false ? wy) 9 FN ROOT GP . 2why was a illegal “Gps Tracker i couse seare . . pléced on my Land Rover 2 Atiag -fo Cony tla in ashich he furryed bail in Abkareas, andl 4 woes neeueene ater ke woee ai one Cor) T Commiited ary crime ? 3) Why on September I, 2015, 7 j earcht ¢ ed over by the FAT and Indianapolis Metre Rott v fora. "Darryl wens, and wheh hey senna Rover ainel Found shat he weed uth » my Lene F . Me, why was TL amesied uolehoaat me “Preybable Gntee" ? ane That he eacertt eat 4) tuhy wos T not given a “Evidence Hearing" -for the Charges brought against me ? 6) Wig are all the FALSE stony) dbo 7y3 dhout ME given my co-defendant & ,oohen tel Tohnsun« testiRed thet “Williams and ~ Toeuneel Stole the gud from, his howe 3 7emey 9) UShg ushen my lasuyer “Lasiro 2616 “ found ; +the Tadianapetis Met Detectics did fabiitg ne aes Fer ACh Y cate that ne id fabifted my Criminal History 4 Reports, she fried feo a Uppression Hearing’Motlan’ 4a bring ap “FRUETS of a POSancus TRE" the Tee “Sq hh Borker* ; enied the Hearing) then I was QIVEn a Rece layer, beanese “Lacie 1108 dismlssed ° 9) Ging ushen lawyer “Mario Goria" filed +O Shows m # ee an correct “Criminal He oat ey SHU used a. Patsttion LECSIEN * Resor" making me ik KE O viclent crimivad i whe aaet never had any felonies tn my life P mn sehich 3. 8) How did the bullets -that my condeféndant had in hi | t 8 backpack at the time of 4 ek deal tH, 206, gét back in my oparimernt at the time ef the CiNo Knock iroffic 4) why was T sentenced auer mi *Gaide Lines" when I t hoy ( oa oe Histon sock a Kenkele dont hove any violence Cer) existing 10) Why did the Judge “Sarah Barker ali at tral the cr saleman from “Al Auto Sells" whe Tt brought the Land Rover -fa return to trial after faisely Saying Thee zt brought athe “ Land Rover wuRth $5 $420, when obvlousiy he dicin§ Knee) adho + ooce, because athen he WAS Asked to Point Me Out at tial, he painted to my co-deferdant, because T never met the guy before P il) Why on une 8; 2015, TuLn9 alleged dropplhg “Crliman off a esorks in Front of Walmart store.on West lOth Street, but there wos Never any Uicleo sureciilance Shoeving me in ang car Gr)in person @r) given a description af the car T evas alleged cirleing at the time oF te robbery ¢ 2) Why did the “Incllanapotis Metro Deteeties Ile ard falsity the Hime 3 date of pruchase of my Lord Rouer, becouse my wife “Rertellas at the Hime pruchased the Lond Rover in AhE meming @ approw flay on August 27, 2618, andl the robbery was committed on August 28, 2013 at night @ approx, 10 pm 1, 50 how outd T howe brought the Lane Rover the same dag of August 23; 2015 of the robbery $ 05/27/2020

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2020)

Attorneys

Christopher Davis
Christopher Davis — Petitioner
Christopher Davis — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent