Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit arbitrarily and erroneously denied Appellant a Certificate of Appealability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . LHe theR THE UNITED STATES CouRT oF APbEAIS FOR |THE NINTH Likcuit ARBITRAKIN & ERkoneously denied — APPEManT LER Ficate of APLEAIAbI I AY stating, “Letition Far | to state anv federal Constifvhianal Claim dehadable anata Jurist DF AEAson, LOhen... the pstrrct cour d¢denied Relief on ftrocedural Grounds, and Stated, “the felidioner seeking a C.0.A. must. shaw Loth ‘that durist of Keasor’ would tind it debatable whether the Pdboy States a Valid chain of the den ial aF a conshidofianal RIGHT and that Jorists OF KEASon Loauld Fine) sf dehatable Luhe ther the Oeste ietLouct LUIAaS Corcectin ths Pracedura| kiln.” ( huating, Slack Ve the Danje | 529 U.S. 473, Y8Y (2000)) , | @