Whether the petitioner has a constitutional right to be exempt from vehicle registration and licensing requirements, and to be compensated for alleged unconstitutional enforcement actions

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ : (1) Now comes Antuan Burress-E]l a free National American Citizen of The : United States of North America. I am requesting a motion to be heard for compensation and redress by the Respondents for unconstitutional codes and policies being enforced as laws against the Petitioner. I’m also requiring free access to all public, private streets, roads, highways, byways, bridges, interstates, intrastate’s, etc. Petitioner is requesting to be honored to fashion a State and Federal number and plate for my private vehicles/ cars/ transportation for safety against policy enforcers. As I exercise my constitutional right to international land and sea travel between United States, Canada, Mexico, the . Caribbean and Bermuda Islands. Reasons being that liberties can not be . ; licensed or for sale. The respondents in this case have no Delegation of Authority orders against the Petitioner nor do they have any constitutional jurisdiction. Unless they can provide the required burden of proof that they have eleventh amendment immunity, I require to be removed from the DMV/ BMV corporate database. (2) Tam requesting a motion to be heard to have my name cleared of all false allegations, debts, perjuries, and victimless crimes held against me. Under Constitutional Jurisdiction of Ohio Supreme Court laws titled: Ohio Traffic Laws. Traffic Rule 13, section (B) The following traffic offenses shall not be Se . processed by a traffic violations bureau: (1) Indictable offenses; (4) Driving while under suspension or revocation of a driver's or commercial driver’s license when jail is a possible penalty; (5) Driving without being licensed to drive when jail is a possible penalty; (9) Drag racing/ speeding. 7 ; . (3) Iam requesting a motion to be heard on the award for private claims : against the corporate surety bonds and/or commercial insurances from the "respondents for its corporate malfeasance crimes. Each of the non-elected | ; officials of the Ohio Department of Public Safety, Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle, and Hamilton County Jobs and Family Serviee are not arms of the State (and ; thus not immune). They have conspired against the Petitioner with no. constitutional jurisdiction and therefore I have suffered deprivation of due process. According to the “Code of Federal Rules for Motor Vehicle Departments — Motor Carrier CFR/ US Code Summary” 49 USC 14501(a)(1)(A), 49 USC 13505 (a)(1)(2), Also The case of Uneek Lowe vs. Hamilton County Jobs and Family Service Decided: July 01, 2010. The DMV and BMV were cognitively committing fraud under Surety Bond # 601077096, a Deputy RegistrarMr. Brain G. Adams was provided a BMV casualty insurance #, but RegistrarMr. Donald Petit was giving the same exact number but was never officially authorized any casualty insurance # during his employment with Ohio BMV representing a corporate malfeasance crime. .