No. 19-8674
Rolando Gus Paez v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adversarial-system civil-procedure dismissal-rule due-process federal-procedure federalism federalism-doctrine habeas-corpus section-2254 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Rule 4 of the rules governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Court violate the federalism doctrine and/or the adversarial system?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does Rule 4 of the rules governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Court, which provides that “lilf it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitionerlI,]” violate the federalism doctrine and/or the adversarial system? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2020-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Rolando Gus Paez
Joseph A. DiRuzzo III — DiRuzzo & Company, Petitioner