No. 19-8680
Adrian Zitalpopoca-Hernandez v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3553 circuit-split comparative-sentencing criminal-sentencing federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion sentencing-disparities sentencing-disparity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6) requires federal judges to compare a defendant's sentence to the sentences of his codefendants, the sentences of defendants nationwide, or a combination of the two
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED To avoid “unwarranted sentence disparities,” does 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6) require federal judges to compare a defendant’s sentence to the sentences of his codefendants (as two circuits hold), the sentences of defendants nationwide (as three circuits hold), or a combination of the two (as six circuits hold)? prefix PARTIES,
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2010-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Adrian Zitalpopoca-Hernandez
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent