Where the U.S. Court of Appeals didn't think that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should apply to the case of multiple pending motions not being acted upon by the judicial officer of the U.S. District Court for months and months after being filed?

Questions Presented Where the U.S. Court of Appeals didn’t think that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should apply to the case of multiple pending motions not being acted upon by the judicial officer of the U.S. District Court for months and months after being filed? Where the U.S. District Court failed or refused to act on multiple motions that asked to vacate an unconstitutional judgment or judgment(s) over the basis of the United States Attorney lying, deceiving, and filing or submitting false facts to the U.S. District Court in a criminal case, even though jurisdiction had already been challenged? Where the U.S. Court of Appeals dismissed the Petition for the Writ of Mandamus even though it was originally asking for mandating that the U.S. District Court act upon the motions asking for vacatur of null and void judgments that were produced out of frauds upon the court by the United States Attorney? Where case law precedent in this very Court and the lower Courts all held that petitioning for the Writ of Mandamus relief is only reserved to special ii circumstances including but not limited to Judges that act in excess of jurisdiction by failing to act or refusing to act on pending motions? Where the “due process of law” clause of the U.S. Constitution, Amendment V, is being deprived and ignored by the U.S. District Court in North Carolina and where judgments/orders that may not even have valid jurisdiction to have ever been entered is being allowed when frauds upon the court have . _ been proven by the Defendant? | iii