No. 19-8686
Beverley M. Harris v. The Bozzuto Group, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-dismissal civil-procedure civil-rights court-access discovery due-process federal-procedure in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion procedural-due-process standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should resolve the questions for which the Federal District Court rejected/denied Petitioner's evidences and amendments, conducted no discovery and trial, and denied her motion for In Forma Pauperis (IFP)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court should resolve the following questions for which the Federal District Court, Newark New Jersey rejected/denied Petitioner’s evidences and amendments, conducted no discovery and trial, denied her motion for In Forma Pauperis (IFP) 5 days after filing her case (
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent Dr. Stefan Gress to respond filed.
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Dr. Stefan Gress
Frederick W. Reif — Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman& Dicker LLP, Respondent
Frederick W. Reif — Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman& Dicker LLP, Respondent
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent