Whether due process was circumvented

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED > Whelfor Due Process Was Ciroumverited hero P. 1) Wether Tle. Claine Fill spon represents” Structural debits’ ? a) Weber The Chime hepresenils ‘Sructura/| ear’ ? DF There. Chtims ave belated in Mature of brad, deee-or Lollusion: 2 4) Whether due process War denied by not Allows ing Any Challenges; é 5) Whether The Chains of presence” Aud ‘pronwuncompal Warrant A hevenral of 4 resulting Csnvielon Whore dePeudtat Was nit at all presen] 3? ( Foe eiMer dne War Lonstibtenal eh ). ete. 6) Whether Hructinal error deboats Over ier the wo Carer Fed by Shes: Appeats Crt SE Exhibit Aypendh A.@) 1) Whether Nore Claas Can be all Consololabed ar requaried for A Cumulshue evalustin pon. A Pacheal al e pracess lelenginalion. ? Copecraly, nce They Al vieve relahd to Nive probare. inom A Cyrnnal Padi lbut public abn. on. . C denied due process; page 5) ? 3) Whether There is A CoP hf upon. dispose Whieh Was Abused by Sais nance al h ” oh heb 2. 4p/6-Noided. 14 “i. udament due. to revirthina the Chava’ _ inharmphon_ Ath e . 1). While. the Stati Mirtornraduel Cruse double eoperd,” ts Athach as Cleasl alleged inthe Piitioon bor CeShalrani ~ See pages: 4, G6. /oylas ih, [Ld3, AY 30;(( Const Ketod/ Maherous proseaitin), 10.) Whether Petitonce's Claims oF alee procesy Violatim denied him yal pooletio ot Te fae 4 by fray ty Ablow Me propince in he Cowl rosm h anntem SNntnce, y , Liat Costin exegn re pages: 3 7 17 car 3, ete Ang ie)